ESPN logoTrueHoop Network
An ESPN Affiliate
Daily Thunder.com
  • Home
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Team
    • Salaries
    • Roster
    • Schedule & Events
  • Commenting Guidelines

Four factors and the last 4

by Joe on March 6, 2009 at 10:48 pm 6 Comments

So we all know that the last four games have been a big success for the Thunder. The first of the four was the overtime loss to Dallas where KD went down in the fourth, and the Thunder almost pulled one out, but played surprising basketball without our big time scorer.  The following three games were equally surprising considering that Jeff Green only played in the first, and Kevin Durant didn’t play in any of them. The Thunder’s play was so inspiring, that it resulted in Mark Cuban  lambasting his team and threatening the players jobs for their effort against the lowly Thunder without it’s stars.

The Thunder did it with defense. If you watched, you noticed. No longer were the Thunder’s opponents in those last four games making big shot after big shot. No longer were they scoring at will. Now, suddenly the Thunder were making these other teams work hard to put points on the board-something we haven’t seen much of this year.

I crunched the numbers for the “four factors” for the last four games to illustrate just how these wins have been coming.

First of all the big picture. In the last four, OKC has had an offensive efficiency of 107 points per 100 possessions. That’s not too bad, league average is 107.9, so we are still right there even without our big guns. The Thunder’s defensive efficiency has been 101.35 points allowed per 100. That is really superb by any measure. The league average defense is also 107.9.

The four factors are the most important aspects that make up the offense and defense, and they tell the tale of our offensive and defensive performance in more detail. The four factors are shooting (eFG%), ball handling (turnover %), offensive rebounding (o-reb %) and getting to the line (FTM/FGA).

Shooting:
eFG% last four: 47.7%
eFG% season: 47.6%
eFG% league avg. 49.9%

Our team shooting has been almost exactly at our season average, yet still below the NBA league average.

Ball handling:
TO%=.155
TO% season avg: .150
TO% league avg. .135

Our high turnover rate has been even a bit higher than the season average.

Offensive rebounding:

OR%=31.4
OR% season: 29.3
OR% league avg.: 26.8

Our typically good rebounding has been even better of late. 31.4% of available offensive rebounds were grabbed by our guys. That would be second in the league.

Getting to the line:

FTM/FGA=.237
FTM/FGA season: .247
FTM/FGA league avg: .238

Our season average of .247 is good for 10th best in the league, however, in the last four we’ve been very average.

Offensively, the four factors are showing that our offense is very average, to below average in most regards except offensive rebounding. Below is the defensive four factors for the Thunder in the last four games, the season and the league average.

Shooting:
Last four opponents eFG% =46.4%
Season avg: 51.4%
League avg: 49.9

Keep in mind, this is what we allow. On the season we allow opponents to shoot 51.4% eFG, which is above average (good for 24th in the league). However, in the last four, we’ve knocked that down to 46.4% eFG. That is just phenomenal. That’s right at Cleveland Cavs level, or best in the league.

Ball handling:
Opp TO% last four: .133
Opp TO season: .127
Opp league avg:  .135

Another area of improvement is forcing turnovers. In the last four, we’ve been getting our hands on more of the opponents passes than we have in prior games this season.

Rebounding:
Opponent’s last fourDef reb%=74.4%
Season avg def reb%=74.5
League avg 73.2

Getting defensive rebounds is the same thing as not letting the opponent get offensive rebounds. We were already good, and the trend is about the same.

Getting to the line:
Opponent’s last four FTM/FGA=.192
FTM/FGA season=.223
league avg. .238

While playing much improved defense in the last four games, the Thunder haven’t been sending the opponents to the line by fouling.

The numbers bear out the conclusion that the Thunder have been playing great defense in these last four games. The eFG% allowed is a 10% improvement over the season average, we are playing the passing lanes with greater success and not fouling too much.

To me, the bigger roles of Thabo and Weaver, added to Westbrook’s already stiff defensive presence means that everything is being challenged on the wing. There isn’t really anyone for the opponent to exploit.

The lineup that has gotten the most minutes lately, featuring Collison, Krstic, Thabo, Weaver and Westbrook has an offensive efficiency of 113.33 points scored per 100 possessions, and has allowed 93.41 per 100. That is a +19.93!

The lineup that saw big minutes in the first and second games with Green, Krstic, Thabo, Weaver and Westbrook has an offensive efficiency of 105.5, and a defensive efficiency of 100; good for + 5.5.

Categories
Other
Previous Post Thabo Sefolosha injured with sprained MCL; listed as day-to-day
Next Post Thunder vs. Hornets: Pre-game primer
6 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
Royce
Royce 5pts

It's amazing how simple but yet incredibly complicated the game of basketball can be.

Crow
Crow 5pts

A quick look shows pretty clearly the SFs who give Durant the most trouble are some of the quality outsider shooters. If they get daylight they are canning them. He needs to stay home / stay close.

http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/oklahoma-city-thunder/players/kevin-durant/profile/09/21/294
Look at opponent efficiency (which is "NBA efficiency" not "offensive efficency" but is still useful for this level of study)

Keith
Keith 5pts

So here's the major question, how does the team respond to Kid Delicious' return? Uncle Jeff always plays solid. He's a very efficient scorer, a good rebounder relative to the team, and always gives full effort on defense. I'm not worried about fitting him back in. KD is a different story. For whatever reason, the team does not play as well offensively with KD in (ironic because he is such a prolific scorer).

The main reason for this is that teammates just expect him to get things done and don't move, screen, or look to take high percentage shots as much (I call this the AI Effect). The team has a bad habit of standing around and playing one-on-one offense when KD is in the game. This as much a coaching thing as it is a player thing.

Defensively, however, is where we will see the greatest impact. KD is no Thabo. He has the physical attributes to be an even better defender, but he's not there yet. As such, there is going to be more penetration from the wings when his is in the game. Are Krstic, Collison, and Green going to be ready to rotate off their man more? Is KD going to recognize and attack the open big? All these questions will be answered soon, and it's going to say a lot about how this last leg of the season finishes up.

Crow
Crow 5pts

Right.

Joe
Joe 5pts

Agreed, the competition has been second tier except Dallas, whom we played twice in the four game numbers, but what makes it special is that we did it without KD and Green for the most part.

Crow
Crow 5pts

Looks good, thanks.

The average offensive rating of the last 4 opponents was 18.5th place. A bit weaker than normal but not much.

Quite a month ahead to test the defense.

For the season they are 4-28 against playoff level teams. Dallas recently was one. How many more do they get this season?

Back to Top

Headlines

  • Fisher’s lawyer claims conflict of interest for Hunter
  • Russell Westbrook is off crutches, says ‘I’m back’
  • Gervin on KD: ‘I think he’ll be much better than me’
  • Report: Mo Cheeks hired as Pistons head coach
  • Nike donating all profits of KD V Elites through 6/15
  • Report: KD dropping agent, expected to change to Jay-Z
  • Mo Cheeks the ‘frontrunner’ for the Pistons job
Daily Thunder
  • Home
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Copyright © 2008-2012 DailyThunder.com
Designed by iThemes Creative & Hosted by Site5