ESPN logoTrueHoop Network
An ESPN Affiliate
Daily Thunder.com
  • Home
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Team
    • Salaries
    • Roster
    • Schedule & Events
  • Commenting Guidelines

Horrific start dooms the Thunder, Mavs hold on 93-87

by Royce Young on May 21, 2011 at 11:56 pm 135 Comments

Joe Murphy/NBAE/Getty Images

BOX SCORE

Turns out the world didn’t end today, but it definitely looked like the Thunder at least got raptured. Because they sure didn’t show up tonight. A push was made to get the game to within six with three minutes left, but a couple rushed shots and the failure to get a few more stops eventually doomed the Thunder in Game 3. But mostly what it was, was a horrific start in which the Mavs led by 15 after the first quarter and extended their first half lead to as much as 23.

Nothing, and I mean nothing went Oklahoma City’s way. For a game as important as this one, disappointment doesn’t even begin to describe things. The crowd was amped as I’ve ever seen it before the game. Sections were actually jumping. My head was hurting two names into the starting lineup.

And maybe all that energy worked against the team a bit as OKC played their age for pretty much three quarters. They looked tight, nervous, anxious, tense and all those other words you want to use. Kevin Durant never was able to break the chains, the team went just 1-17 from deep and shot 36.5 percent from the floor. I kept just repeating one word most of the game: disaster. That’s what it felt like. Even when the Thunder clawed back into the game in the fourth quarter, it still seemed like Dallas was ahead by 20 because you just knew Dirk was going to drop a couple backbreakers. And he did. The way the Thunder won Game 2 — by making a bundle of contested shots in big moments — they lost Game 3. They didn’t make hardly a single momentum shot. They didn’t hit but a few contested looks. Heck, they probably missed more open ones than they did covered ones. Nobody — not one player on the team — shot the ball well. After that first quarter, the Thunder played desperate, actually outscoring Dallas 75-66 the final three. But going just 4-17 the first 12 minutes is what lost this game for the Thunder. The offense was completely out of sync in every way. OKC got it to six, got two stops and had two 3s with a chance to cut it to three. Russell Westbrook rushed a 3 and then Daequan Cook missed badly on a clean look from deep. Those two shots really tell a lot of the story. Bad, bad shooting. Again, just 1-17 from 3. That stat might keep you up tonight.

“Russell’s 3 might’ve been an opportunity for him to attack because his attack game was on tonight,” Scott Brooks said. “But DC’s 3s were wide open. That’s what he’s in there for.”

Look at some numbers: Durant scored 24, but on 7-22 shooting. Westbrook was basically the reason OKC got back in this game as he scored 30 including eight straight in the fourth, but he was just 8-20 from the floor and had only four assists and seven turnovers. Really, take away the free throw line (32-36) and the Thunder are completely dead.

You tell me Dirk is going to go 7-21 for only 18 points, Jason Terry 3-12 for 13 and J.J. Barea would score only four points, I’m thinking the Thunder took this game easily. But that would be under the assumption that OKC you know, would actually make a few. They didn’t. Well, actually maybe that’s correct. They only did make a few.

It’s a shame to give home court right back here, but my feeling has always been that the Thunder either wins this series in six games or loses it in seven. Either one is still an option. I’ve felt from the beginning that this game would likely hinge on Game 5 in Dallas. The Thunder have to bounce back once again, but I think all of us even in our never-ending optimism felt like this series would likely be 2-2 going back to Dallas. Now in order to get there, the Thunder have to show up in Game 4. The world hasn’t ended for the Thunder, even though it sort of feels like it right now.

NOTES:

  • There is no doubt the Thunder were finally allowed to play Dirk with a bit more physicality tonight. He only took ONE free throw and that came from a technical. Rick Carlisle tried to tread lightly talking about that but still had a comment: “I don’t know in terms of legal limits. I believe the line has been crossed at times.” Collison was permitted to get away with a lot more, especially off the ball. But most of it truly was just great defense.
  • The Thunder won a lot of the box score. Outrebounded Dallas 45-37. Took 18 more free throws. Had nine blocks. Equaled the Mavs with 42 points in the paint. Really the separation was that Dallas hit seven 3s and OKC just one. In those terms, the Mavs outscored OKC by 18. That was the difference.
  • KD on the Thunder’s start: “Frustrating.”
  • KD is now 2-18 in this series from 3 and 0-13 the last two games. But he’s not going to stop firing. “I can’t come into a game and pass up wide open shots.” There’s no doubt about that. OKC has to have Durant taking — and making — 3-pointers.
  • The Mavs defense really does deserve most of the credit. They were much more active, especially in the first half. “We were much better defensively and we had to be,” Carlisle said. “Tonight we played championship level defense for the first time in the series. Now the challenge is to sustain.”
  • KD should bet his house that he doesn’t shoot as poorly again.
  • OKC missed a big opportunity to cut into Dallas’s lead in the third. The Mavs went just 6-22, but the Thunder responded by going 7-21. In the end, despite a touch of momentum and a decent run, the Thunder only made up two points going into the fourth. There was a chance to maybe have it at eight or less.
  • Serge Ibaka picked up his first block of the series in the first quarter. That’s kind of amazing.
  • Scott Brooks was asked pregame about his starting five and said there would be “some long, hard discussions” about possibly inserting Harden into the first five. He said there wouldn’t be any changes this year though.
  • I have never seen a crowd that was begging a team more to get in a game than this one. It was remarkable to see people cheering for every stop and rebound down 20. It was impressive.
  • It really never looked like the Thunder had any kind of flow or rhythm in this game. Most of their good play was as a result of attacking, scrapping and getting to the line. Only 11 assists total for the team. Reminded me of the offense during the first two months of the season, except this was against a much better team.
  • James Harden had just seven points and was 2-9 from the floor. He did have nine rebounds though.
  • The Thunder bench saw only two players score combining for a total of 16 points. Quite a reversal from Game 2.
  • I don’t know what I thought about the rotations tonight. OKC really was able to pick things up offensively when Brooks went with KD at center, but Tyson Chandler was able to out-muscle him for two big rebounds. I’m not sure how much Perk really adds right now. He just doesn’t match well with Chandler. He’s great when the other team has a player that’s a post presence and a focus of the offense. But with an energy, garbage player like Chandler, Perk doesn’t do as well. At least this Perk that’s not close to 100 percent.
  • Eric Maynor didn’t play a second in the fourth quarter. I wonder if he’s like so pissed right now.
  • This is old news now, but I asked Brooks pregame if the roles were reversed and KD were on the bench during a big fourth quarter bench push, would he have left him there too? His answer: “That’s probably not fair to talk in hypotheticals. It didn’t happen. If it does happen, I’d be willing to answer that question.” In other words, “I hate your question. Next.” After, Berry Tramel made a good point saying he would’ve said no, because Durant is much more versatile and there’s no Eric Maynor behind KD. Good answer.
  • Oklahomans Hanson sang the national anthem. My 1995 wife was stoked. And former Thunder great and mustache Hall of Famer Kevin Ollie did the pregame prayer. Pretty cool.
  • The atmosphere in the arena before tip was as charged up as I’ve ever seen it. Maybe Game 3 against the Lakers was as good or better, but it the place was absolutely ballistic.
  • For people in the arena, was the PA and music ridiculously loud to anyone else tonight? Felt that way to me.
  • I have no idea what tonight’s halftime show was supposed to be. Some guys in gold suits slowly dancing?
  • On the Harden flop: Everyone really freaked out on me on Twitter about it when I said if I couldn’t tell if it was a flop or not. Chandler definitely hit him in the face. Harden sold it more than he needed to though.

Say it with me: 26-6 after a loss. Twenty-six and six.

Next up: Game 4 in OKC Monday.

Categories
Recap
Previous Post Mavericks vs. Thunder: Game 3 Pregame Primer
Next Post Do the Thunder have a Perk problem?
134 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
okc baby
okc baby 5pts

They take blogs to personal. Its a blog guys and just a game. I ll still love this team win or lose

okc baby
okc baby 5pts

Dont think Brooks is going to be fired anytime soon

okc baby
okc baby 5pts

Off with his head already. hahaha

DJ 7
DJ 7 5pts

@Crow

Thank you on the stats and answer to my question. Its good that i'm not the only one who thinks that we should be doing what you suggested. I was always wondering if a Perkins-Collison duo would offset the negatives that come with having Perkins and Harden on the floor toghether and apparently it does. If we do play an Ibaka/Perkins should we not do it when they have a line up of Marion/Haywood on the floor since they do for about 6 minutes a game, and then switch Haywood for Chandler(Which Perkins isn't completely out match but since Ibaka is so busy with Dirk he can't rotate to help Perk.)

As to the moderation, i guess my suggestion isn't strict moderation. I understand when we curse during in game times, or when Justin and OKC Baby go at each other. Which is fine, we're men thats how we let agression go, but for instance Dylan and Skeletor going at each other was another step from the way Justin and OKC Baby do, or when I went at Cdub00.

Personal shots need to be shut down immediately because yesterday one took shot at the other mans family, and the other one took a shot the others future. You get what i'm talking about? I'm not surprise that they both got upset and attacked each other, and i understand that Royce is so busy all he could really do is say "Chill".

TaoMaas
TaoMaas 5pts

@CenOK

Before we fire Brooks can we at least wait until he stops improving the team's standing every year? lol At the rate he's going, even if we don't win it all this year, we'll be in the NBA championship game next year.

Crow
Crow 5pts

That Pleiss had trouble against Nathan Peavy is probably more troubling than it would have been if it was against Hines.

CenOK
CenOK 5pts

Bottom line: Brooks has to make some significant changes or he has to go. Unless of course we want to be that token team who makes it to the 2nd/3rd round every year but never wins a damn thing.

Crow
Crow 5pts

Perkins will hopefully be more fully recovered next season and have several good & healthy seasons ahead of him. But age at some point is a factor with players and bigs in particular. No hard in fast rule but after 26, after 28, after 30 it becomes a bit harder to jump, or repeat jump or slide well, etc. Perkins probably has a fairly high total NBA game minutes for his age and legs. At some point you begin managing total minutes from a season and life of contract perspective. You want him at his best for the playoffs probably, in case you really need him. They might not need as much from him sometimes, even in the playoffs.
Extra work on mobility and / or weight control or loss would be part of the bigger picture of moving into and thru the next seasons.

Daniel Plainview
Daniel Plainview 5pts

@TempBoy Brandon

Thr last reason not to start Harden was, "Dont fix what isnt broke." Is there anyone who believes it isnt broken?

Fact: Harden starting woul open things up for our offense

Fact: Harden starting would draw more fouls, to wit, get Mavs in foul trouble early, starters sit, we develop a big lead.

Fact: lead would prevent the hero impulse from our two main scorers

Fact: Defenses can no longer ignore three of our players on offense, in turn, they cannot sag off our sg and collapse on Russ and KD, hence our no 1 and 2 options do not force shots amd have more room to breathe, more energy for defense

Thrse are just some of the positive, and painfully conspicuous, positve reasons for starting Harden. Those who believe Sef is a better defender than Harden are going by his defensive value last year. Last year Thabo was a great defender. This year, Harden is as good and significantly better on offense

TempBoy Brandon
TempBoy Brandon 5pts

I'd be okay with losing if I thought they were truly the better team. I really would. But it's so obvious that outside of the 12 minutes we give our starting five every game, we are the better team.

The crowd was electric last night. The only sure fire way to take the crowd out was by starting a game behind by so much, which is exactly what we did.

I really feel like the coaches are losing the games for us, not the players. And that's what hurts the most.

james1
james1 5pts

One thing, those that say Hollinger points out what others have on this board have been saying for months. Hollinger said Perkins was not a good matchup in this series only. So the "for months" part would not apply.

On slow starts, I honestly think when we have a game where we hit everything like we did in game 2 we tend to come out settling for jump
shots and not attacking. That's exactly what we did last night. We have been so inconsistent even throughout the playoffs you can tell we're a young team. This experience has been so valuable no matter what else happens.

Crow
Crow 5pts

typo correction: ... "by" IP address.

Crow
Crow 5pts

Bob :@Crow
if you read this it was Nathan Peavy that dominated him not Kyle Hines. My bad. And it was yesterday in a playoff game in germany.

Thanks for the clarification.

@DJ 7

It is pretty much up to Royce how the moderation gets done. Joe is already working to have some impact when he is on the site, ramping up slowly, while showing restraint. It is fairly tough because if the commenting guidelines were to be enforced strictly there would be a lot of enforcement at times and that is kinda drag in itself even if it might be called for and help in the end.

Seems like a number of folks have drifted away some (out of game threads especially) or entirely because of basketball discussions that transform into personal shots or even attacks pretty frequently. Some people seem to look to instigate and some people fall into defense / counter-attack maybe even if they didn't really want to because they don't like to leave a rude attack unchallenged. I have been tempted several times to drift back or out myself because of that stuff and still might do one or the other. It just gets old to wade thru.

The possibility that some people have multiple accounts is something that would seem worth looking into my IP address. Has it? It could be that that there are one or a few main problems and it may be that initial enforcement could focus on them most heavily.

I don't know exactly where the line is or should be between freedom (and being somewhat slack about the guidelines) and intervention (enforcing them a high % of the time) but a lot of stuff was let go for a long time and it will make change harder or at least more abrupt. Super-strict enforcement might not be the most ideal long-term. Some jostling is inevitable and seems ok for adults within bounds but if you give a bit of slack there are obviously folks who will take more and more and ever more. Good luck finding the right balance.

Should a big change in moderation be attempted right now or after these playoffs? That is an administrative question. It could be done either way. It will always depend on time and willingness to do a messy / difficult job.

Sammy would probably be another good moderator if Royce and Joe want more time coverage and want more help. There are others who could be good too. If asked by those in charge and if they are willing. I am not going to be named a moderator and I will not be seeking or accepting that role for several reasons.

As for your basketball questions from late in the last game thread,

In the playoffs it appears that playing with Collison works for Perkins and the team and that is more powerful than other pairings and that he is even good with Harden and Westbrook when also with Collison at the same time. The problems of Perkins with Westbrook and Harden must come when not with Collison also. And especially now with Perkins against Chandler.

Westbrook-Harden-Durant-Collison-Perkins is actually a fantastic +30 for the entire playoffs but in just 48 total minutes or about 4 minutes per game. Taking that up to 8-12-16 minutes per game would seem like a good strategy to me.

Yes, I agree with you, I'd start Collison PF -Ibaka C to best deal with Dirk - Chandler. Trying it would seem better to me than repeating what they used the first 3 games and went down to deficits in each 1st first quarter. Try it and see what happens.

Then go Collison - Perkins when Haywood comes in. They will probably need to use some Ibaka=Perkins but they better pick the right times for that better than they have.

JJJ
JJJ 5pts

@Congo

I dunno what is worse: the same offensive problems coming up over and over again in the season, or that the Thunder are a Top 5 offensive club in spite of these issues.

I just feel like we're wasting so much talent out there with some of the sets (or lack of sets) that we run

Mark!
Mark! 5pts

congo :
more to blame on brooks:
http://nbaplaybook.com/2011/05/22/oklahoma-citys-offense-and-the-lack-of-creativitymovement/

The Pruiti article is golden. I've had these concerns for a long time. It's amazing that our players are so talented that they can succeed in spite of these rather significant (IMO) problems.

Brooks needs serious help on offense.

congo
congo 5pts

and the players

congo
congo 5pts

more to blame on brooks:

http://nbaplaybook.com/2011/05/22/oklahoma-citys-offense-and-the-lack-of-creativitymovement/

DJ 7
DJ 7 5pts

@DJ 7

We're blessed to see a class act of guys play in front of us who give it their all almost every night. Not players who while your waiting for their suppose autograph sessions they never show up and your nephew is left in tears(Kobe) So please act like a classy crowd.

DJ 7
DJ 7 5pts

Also, a few friends and family who attended the game yesturday told me that some people in their section were booing the team before the half time buzzer.

I swear if anyone boo's in my section AT THE TEAM because of their performance i deck them hard. Okay i wouldn't but i would more than likely say something very mean.

I don't want us to become like the too cool for school Laker fans, or Classless Knick, or Jerk of Celtic fans. Even the Mavs fans who are cocky. I don't want us to be anything like that. so litterally to anyone who attended the game yesturday and are reading this, if you boo'd the team well SHAME ON YOU!!

DJ 7
DJ 7 5pts

MarquetteThunder :
First time posting but enjoy the site. @ Daniel – I believe Wilbon did a masterful job (sarcasm) of going after Westbrook again. Of course, he went after his assist to turnover ratio and completely downplayed Westbrook’s performance. The thing that irked me was Jon Barry and Wilbon completely attacking the crowd. They said we were silent “until the very end.” I was there and for a team that was down 20+ at several points of the game, every 4 or 6 point streak to get it to 16 or 18 led to several loud moments begging the team to continue.
Also, I did not realize this but that was Westbrook’s 5th technical last night. If we were to advance, that will be huge.
I’m not going to get down on this team and some can frustrate me with their negativity. We are two years removed from being a 23-win team! To me, we are playing with house money and win or lose, this team gets a standing ovation from me every night.

Welcome to the site, hope you comment more!

I don't even like watching the post game peaps because, well they are huge butt kissers and for some reason we really don't get much love from that group. On the other side at least Kenny and Barkley(as full as crap as he is) more than not tell it like it is.

Twistdov
Twistdov 5pts

@CenOK

Oh me neither man, didn't mean to imply anything like that. And yeah I agree, you'd think he'd be cool with it. Hell he was first in line to defend Brooks' decisions in game 2

CenOK
CenOK 5pts

@Twistdov

My criticism of Perk is no shot at him, or his potential. Seeing as how he has himself admitted that he's only around 65%, it seems that he would understand a reduction in minutes against a team with such an athletic big man.

Twistdov
Twistdov 5pts

TaoMaas :

Daniel Plainview : The Thunder’s starting lineup once again dug a huge hole for them, falling behind by double-digits early. It was the third straight game this series that Oklahoma City trailed with its starting five on the floor.

This is true, but contrary to what we’d like to believe on here, I don’t think James Harden is the answer. I would be willing to bet that the Thunder would still start out slow over 50% of the time regardless of whether or not Harden was starting. I think it’s our offensive scheme…or lack of. We let teams push us too far out. Then, if the shots aren’t falling (like last night), we’re sitting ducks.

I agree with this 100% and will add: Nazr should be getting some minutes against Dallas. The reason teams push us out & get away with it is because we have zero low-post offensive skill. At least Mohammed has *some* scoring ability.

Brooks needs Sefolosha's trusty defensive presence, so I seriously doubt we see a switch there -- but the aforementioned Collison (or even Mohammed) instead of Perk makes alot of sense. But let's not dog Perk too much, he's clearly not near 100%. Watching him run makes MY knees hurt.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

The Onion takes Russ
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/articles/russell-westbrook,20506/

CenOK
CenOK 5pts

I like the idea of Harden running the point full time, but that will never happen.

pion17
pion17 5pts

I hate to say it but I think Chandler would have be a much better fit for OKC. I know that Perk isn't 100% but he is so damn slow and offers next to nothing to our offense, I would rather have an athletic rebounder like Chandler or Joel Anthony.
And another big problem are the no show performances of Durant if the team needs him. It's like JVG said, if you tell a Stranger that Durant is one of the best of the world he couldn't spot him on the floor.

dmcguire
dmcguire 5pts

what do you think of a lineup next year that starts westbrook, harden, durant, ibaka and perkins, with harden at the point and westbrook at the two? it's been said harden is our best facilitator and the offense would likely move better without every possession going through westbrook.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

@soonerballer
I think you have to look at the productivity of specific lineups versus just looking at the production of single players. These guys' productivity is affected by who they are playing with. That's what Hollinger is really saying. The starting unit is worthless against them, but that the Thunder have lineups that have proven to be effective against the Mavs. So there is a chance to win. Regardless of their depth in terms of pure shooters/scorers.

soonerballer
soonerballer 5pts

@Thomas
Yup. NBA games, particularly this deep in the playoffs, are seldom won on the strength of the starting unit's production. Many of these posts are demanding that OKC strengthen the starting lineup by inserting the most productive bench players in place of the least productiver starters. Problem with that is that if your new starting unit does not stake you to an enormous lead, you are in a world of hurt when the time comes to rest them. What we need much more than lineup tinkering at this stage is depth to match up with a team like Dallas.a Here's a scary thought. What will we do when Terry goes off again? He's capable of taking over a game, putting up 30 or more with most in the fourth period. Or What if Barea has another big game? Or Peja?

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

@soonerballer
I see what you're saying. Lineups other than our starting lineup (what Hollinger's referring to) v. point production from reserve players alone (what you're referring to).

soonerballer
soonerballer 5pts

@Thomas
Games 1, 2, and 3 have been decided by 9, 6, and 6 points respectively - with their bench outscoring our by 11 points. Hard to overlook.

TaoMaas
TaoMaas 5pts

@CenOK

Yeah, this is a bad series for Perk. All these losses are frustrating because we've seen what this team can do when it's clicking. I expect to see the Thunder bounce back this next game. That seems to be the way this series is going. We see what the Mavs are doing, so we adjust. Then they adjust to our adjustment...so now we'll adjust to their adjustment of our adjustment, etc... lol There may not be a clear winner to this series. The team who advances may be whoever is holding the ball when time runs out.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

@Thomas
Which, to be clear, is to say that for a team down 20+ it is inconceivable that any crowd could be louder than that.

soonerballer
soonerballer 5pts

@Thomas
I don't think the article says our Thunder bench is "comfortably" outscoring the Mavericks bench, only scoring better after the first substitutions. Actually our bench has been outscored 110 to 78 over the first three games, including a 53 to 22 hammering in game 1.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

@MarquetteThunder
That is flat out unbelievable what they said about the crowd. Considering how far down we were I can guaran-damn-tee you that was the loudest crowd in the history of team sports. What a couple of jag-offs.

MarquetteThunder
MarquetteThunder 5pts

First time posting but enjoy the site. @ Daniel - I believe Wilbon did a masterful job (sarcasm) of going after Westbrook again. Of course, he went after his assist to turnover ratio and completely downplayed Westbrook's performance. The thing that irked me was Jon Barry and Wilbon completely attacking the crowd. They said we were silent "until the very end." I was there and for a team that was down 20+ at several points of the game, every 4 or 6 point streak to get it to 16 or 18 led to several loud moments begging the team to continue.

Also, I did not realize this but that was Westbrook's 5th technical last night. If we were to advance, that will be huge.

I'm not going to get down on this team and some can frustrate me with their negativity. We are two years removed from being a 23-win team! To me, we are playing with house money and win or lose, this team gets a standing ovation from me every night.

CenOK
CenOK 5pts

@TaoMass

You're right. But Perk also didn't do much to prevent the loss. And the fact that we were in a position to win if we could have just shot a little better from deep, makes the choice of line ups all the more frustrating.

Let's also not forget who the majority of that praise for Brooks was coming from. Although I was very shocked to see him stick with that line up as it continued to work.

TaoMaas
TaoMaas 5pts

@CenOK

I'm not sure how badly Brooks is being exploited. It was only one game ago that he was being praised for being ballsy enough to sit his starters and stick with his back-ups to close out a game. Very few coaches would have made that call. I know it feels like we're getting the crap kicked out of us at times, but the fact remains that the line-ups being used have put the Thunder in a position where they could have won every game, even when they're playing way below their potential. Perk didn't lost that game last night. Going 1-17 (or whatever we ended up with) from 3 had a lot more to do with it.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

@soonerballer
Go read Hollinger's write up (http://goo.gl/JSinw) our backups are not being overmatched. According to him they're actually "comfortably" outscoring Dallas.

soonerballer
soonerballer 5pts

We need to look at the reality of this series. Dallas is the deepest team in the league and Carlisle is doing a masterfull job of using that depth to his advantage. Our starters are overmatched against their wily veterans and our backups are overmatched even worse. We have already been blessed with one miracle, their very poor performance in game 2. We will probably not get another gift like that.

CenOK
CenOK 5pts

And once again, if Brooks wants to continue to keep the same starting 5 then fine, but he's gotta show better discretion when it comes to getting scorers in there once the offense inevitably stalls to start each half. There is also no excuse for Perk to be playing more minutes than Ibaka and especially Collison in this particular series. I understand being consistent, but the NBA is about match ups and Brooks is being exploited in this series.

CenOK
CenOK 5pts

While I for agree to an extent, it seems to me that playing illogical line ups in the conference finals is exactly the type of thing that can cost a coach his job.

Bob
Bob 5pts

@Crow if you read this it was Nathan Peavy that dominated him not Kyle Hines. My bad. And it was yesterday in a playoff game in germany.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

@TaoMaas
Good point. He's got an incredibly hard (and scrutinized) job. But I wonder if years from now he'll look back and come to the same conclusion as the everyone else. Woulda, coulda, shoulda.

The only thing worse than the feeling of not winning it all will be the remorse and second guessing.

TaoMaas
TaoMaas 5pts

We seem to forget on here that we're all gambling with Monopoly money while Brooks is being asked to bet his career. If he's a little slower to take a flyer, then we ought to be smart enough to understand why.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

Oh, I totally agree. I think it's become sort of a foregone conclusion that we have years of contender status ahead of us. But a great man once said, (not sure who) "shit happens." And it's as true today as ever. Shit happens. We need to seize the moment here because you never know what tomorrow will bring.

Daniel Plainview
Daniel Plainview 5pts

I suppose Wilbon, Scott and the like enjoy signing autograghs too much. Divas.

I missed Wilbons excrucitaing analysis last night. What sewage cam from his mouth?

Daniel Plainview
Daniel Plainview 5pts

@Thomas
The sad thing is, is they all seem on board with it all. For crying out loud, they tried Rush Limbaugh, whats next, Glenn Beck?

CenOK
CenOK 5pts

@Thomas

My issue is that Brooks really doesn't seem to learn. Look at the way Jeff Green was used last playoffs against the Lakers. And then the way he continued to be used this season up until the time of the trade. Fast forward to this post season and we are still facing line up issues. Brooks has already stated that there have been lengthy discussions about inserting Harden into the starting 5, meaning in other words that it needs to happen, but the coaching staff refuses to pull the trigger. It also seems like a great deal of the time Brooks has no rhyme or reason with his line ups, he's just throwing different looks out there and seeing what happens. The conference finals is not the time for that sort of experimentation.

I also understand the argument that this team is young and there is plenty of time to fix these issues. But as someone who grew up a die-hard Magic fan, I know how quickly the "sure thing" can become derailed. One serious injury to KD and a free agent departure of Russ, Harden, or Ibaka and we're quickly back to a lottery team. Hell look at the Orlando of recently or Portland. This team is far too talented to squander the potential we have by running vanilla offensive schemes with line ups that make absolutely no sense.

Thomas
Thomas 5pts

@Daniel Plainview
I think the TMZ analogy is totally apt. Their coverage is becoming increasingly sensationalized. It is apparent the game isn't enough for them, they need some off field/court "drama" to cover as well. And if it doesn't exist, well that won't get in the way of them covering it anyway.

Trackbacks

  1. Horrific start dooms the Thunder, Mavs hold on 93-87 | Daily … | Follow The Swarm says:
    May 22, 2011 at 5:01 am

    [...] Visit link: Horrific start dooms the Thunder, Mavs hold on 93-87 | Daily … [...]

Back to Top

Headlines

  • KD named All-NBA first team, Westbrook second team
  • Perk donates $25,000 to help build shelters in schools
  • Report: Mo Cheeks to interview with the Pistons
  • Thunder land the 12th pick in the 2013 draft
  • Thunder donate $1 million to aid with disaster relief
  • Kevin Durant donates $1 million to disaster relief
  • Serge Ibaka named first team All-Defense
Daily Thunder
  • Home
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Copyright © 2008-2012 DailyThunder.com
Designed by iThemes Creative & Hosted by Site5