It’s called the LaMarcus Aldridge Rule, but maybe it should be called the Kevin Durant Rule. Because it seems to always go his way.
With the Thunder holding on to a two-point lead against the Nets, 108-106, with 1:52 left, Durant drove hard to his right and tossed a floating layup at the backboard. Kris Humphries pinned the ball against the glass, simultaneously it appeared. Ball to Brooklyn, down two with a chance to tie or take the lead.
Instead, a whistle blows, two points to the Thunder. Goaltending on Humphries.
This time the play was reviewable because, of course, the play last season against the Blazers where Aldridge blocked Durant’s shot against the backboard except OKC got two points. The league admitted error on the play, but not before the Thunder forced overtime and won the game. Even with the review this time around though, the call still went KD’s way, OKC got a big two points and then finished off the Nets for a big 117-111 win to go to 15-4.
It was one of those survival games for the Thunder. They had a 16-point second half lead, but some dodgy lineup choices allowed the Nets a big spurt to close to within four heading to the fourth. Here’s what happened: The Nets went small, playing Gerald Wallace at power forward. Scott Brooks took Durant out of the game, put Serge Ibaka in to replace him and the Thunder had two bigs on the floor against Brooklyn.
The Nets spread the floor, ran high pick-and-pop action with Jerry Stackhouse and Deron Williams, and basically abused Ibaka’s tendency to follow the ball. Stackhouse drilled a couple 3s, then Wallace did the same. Just like that, Brooklyn was back in the game and things were staged for a fourth quarter struggle. Really, had the Thunder lost, those final six minutes of the third were going to be the thing we all were going to point at.
The Thunder went small themselves to began the final frame and started the quarter +6, extending a four-point lead to 10. Problem was, that group couldn’t rebound. KD wasn’t bailing OKC out on the boards and the Nets were living off second chances. So Brooks went back to his bigs putting Perk and Ibaka in with 4:37 left, removing Kevin Martin. The Nets stayed small. It seemed like a risky choice. But Perk proved Brooks right.
OKC got stops, finally got a few rebounds and relied upon the high screen-and-roll action from Durant and Westbrook to get them home. One play really summed up how Brooks’ move worked: Deron Williams was punishing OKC and with 2:49 left and OKC clinging to a 108-104 lead, Perk got caught in a mismatch with Williams.
Williams of course has one of the deadliest handles in the league and seemed to be a lock to cut this thing to two or even one. Williams tested his cross twice, Perk didn’t bite and so Williams drove hard to his left with Perk staying with him step-for-step. Williams stepped back for a baseline jumper, but Perk was with him the whole way, getting a hand on the shot and collecting the rebound.
Perk is just an intelligent player who understands time and space. He knows when to double, when to help, when to stick and when to switch. The Nets smallball lineup didn’t hurt OKC the last four minutes largely because they couldn’t exploit Ibaka’s ballwatching. Why? Because Perk took Wallace and Ibaka got Humphries.
It worked out. The Thunder got the stops they needed, Durant and Westbrook scored, Thabo Sefolosha came up with a huge backbreaking offensive rebound and layup and the Thunder escaped with certainly their best road win of the season, and maybe the best overall period.
It wasn’t exactly pretty and there were those moments where you’re yelling things you don’t mean in frustration, but the fact of the matter is, a win tonight was going to be outstanding any way it came.
The Thunder had won five straight coming in, but not really against any notable opponents. The Nets are notable. And it was on the road. I honestly think we should be past the point of needing validation the Thunder are very good, but if you were looking for a little more evidence, there it was.
NOTES:
- OK, so what happened with Ibaka during that Nets run in the third? Basically, he just got lost in help defense. He followed the ball and forgot his man. It was almost an exact repeat of the Finals with Shane Battier. Ibaka is a shotblocker, and that’s what he thinks his value is on the defensive end. So with Williams and Stackhouse driving in the paint, naturally Ibaka sagged off and was timing up their layup attempt. Except whoops, Gerald Wallace is all alone on the 3-point line.
- Offensive rebounding stat: Nets 16, Thunder two. Except in this case, 2> 16. Because Thabo’s was bigger than all 16 of the Nets’ combined.
- Naturally, Deron Williams completely broke out of a shooting slump tonight. He entered the game shooting under 40 percent. He hit 10-of-20 tonight, included 5-of-9 from 3.
- Brooklyn fans ooh’d and ahh’d all night. Any little crossover they were acting like it was the best ankle breaker you’ve ever seen. I’m not complaining about it. I kind of liked the involvement.
- I think I might start calling Nick Collison, Johnny Basketball. Why? I have no idea. Seems like it fits.
- It’s a sad state of affairs when Andray Blatche kills you on the offensive glass.
- Via Howard Beck: “New favorite thing: Every time Ibaka disagrees with call, he says, ‘Come on, Boss!’ to refs.”
- Grant Long really needs to quit saying “dunk it!” when a Thunder player is driving at the rim. It kind of ruins the whole dunk experience.
- KD almost Mosgov’d Blatche. So close.
- Now 10 straight games over 100.
- Highly disappointing that most Thunder players went with white shoes to go with the alternate uniforms tonight.
- When he doesn’t get to the elbow, Westbrook really should consider eliminating the pull up jumper in transition. I honestly don’t mind the stop-and-pop when he’s around the free throw line. But the one from 18 is no good. It’s essentially a turnover.
- The Thunder shot 60.6 percent. And almost lost. How? Because they only took 66 shots to Brooklyn’s 91.
- The Nets definitely lived and died with the 3 tonight. They hit 14, but attempted 34.
- Don’t you love those random first quarters where Thabo is just filling it up?
- Ibaka’s lack of awareness on that possession with about 1:20 left was infuriating. He caught the ball with about 10 on the shot clock, didn’t seem to realize it was winding down, then once he did, instead of making a play himself, he passed it to Perk 22 feet from the basket.
- Only four shots for Kevin Martin tonight, all in the first half.
- Best 14 minutes Eric Maynor has played all season. He was aggressive, created and made plays. He was playing so well I was honestly a little disappointed Brooks brought Westbrook back so early.
- KD with 32 on 16 shots. He’s pretty good.
- Brian Davis Line of the Night: “The Nets are down to their last match and there’s an awfully strong wind blowing.”
Next up: The Lakers at home Friday.





I love it when Grant yells "Dunk it!" b/c we're both yelling the same thing. BD & Grant both do a great job. If I wanted to watch announcers that didn't care at all who won, I'd buy the NBA Season Pass.
@Gyella I love you homer announcers as much as the next guy but sometimes with our boys it is just too much! While i love the Thunder as much as the next guy it would be nice to get some good honest feedback during a game
@Gyella Im not a fan of Grant long
http://www.dailythunder.com/2012/12/wednesday-bolts-12-5-12/#respond
Bolts! Click 'em!
@ou_sas I dont trust you!!
@Lambchop @ou_sas
If you can't trust ou_sas, you can't trust anyone.
@Lambchop I'm not one of those who spreads false links. :P
My only real worry is just how effective it was for the Nets (a team with little depth but at least one high quality rebounder) to go small against us. The Heat decimated us in the exact same way, and I am worried that it is becoming a pattern. It seems like most top teams could exploit this, going small early to mitigate Durant/Westbrook, then simply weathering the bench battle.
As we all know, playing big only works when you have big men that excel at big man things. Perkins is a poor rebounder and Ibaka has been very pedestrian on the boards as well. Neither are adept perimeter defenders. So really, going big against a small lineup gives us no real advantage with the current makeup of the team. This isn't something we can just scheme for either. We do not have a powerful frontcourt that can impose its will against smaller defenders. I'm beginning to feel the Jeff Green conundrum about Perkins. It's not that Perkins is a terrible player, but it seems the team is committed to utilizing him in the worst possible ways.
@Keith00That's kind of why I was hoping PJ3 would develop into a viable option. He's fluid enough to guard the perimeter but can also play the 4. Obviously he's not ready and won't probably get a good look this year with Thabeet's play but it would be nice to have a 4 that can guard the perimeter besides KD.
@okcjim I don't know that PJ3 actually solves the problem. He wasn't a strong rebounder in college, and it's unlikely he becomes one in the NBA. Thabeet might be able to make a dent just by being stronger on the glass, but that's projecting a lot. The perfect solution is Varejao, but a internally the best option is for Ibaka to become a more all-around defender. He's in his 4th year. He can't keep getting lost ballwatching or getting worse on the glass if he is to live up to that contract.
@okcjim @justin_mia I don't think that's true. If, as you are saying, we were only a few possessions away, doesn't it make sense that the more mobile defender (Varejao) would have caused more misses from Bosh? Doesn't it make sense that the better offensive player (Varejao) would have hit more shots, or at least forced the Heat defense not to play 10 feet off him?
@justin_mia @Keith00My comment was sarcastic. Perk isnt a bad perimeter defender for a center. The difference in the series last year IMO was the Heat's other guys hitting shots. Lebron, Wade, KD and Russ all got theirs. Their extras hit their shots and ours didn't help (including Harden). It wasn't a rebounding problem. We would have lost with Varejo.
@okcjim @Keith00 Varejao isn't bad at defending the perimeter, definitely better at it than any of our big guys.
@Keith00 @justin_miaIs Verejo going to guard Lebron or switch to Battier on the kick outs? Rebounding isn't our biggest flaw.
@Keith00 @justin_mia
When you are talking 1 possession games 3-5 3's is huge from a guy that shot 33% percent last year. That's just his contribution on 3 pointers too.
@okcjim @justin_mia Justin, the only real solution I see here is pursuing Varejao. The most realistic fix though is for the coaches to get on Ibaka to improve.
@okcjim @justin_mia You could, or you could say he averaged only 5 shots per game, and we shouldn't have lost a game over 5 shots from a bench player.
@okcjim People on here probably could rebound better than perk is.
@Keith00 @justin_miaThat's why I said PJ3 (or a 4 that can guard the perimeter) would be helpful. It allows us to go small and keep KD at the 3.
Battier's impact was overstated? He was 15-26 on 3's in the series. 3 of our 4 losses came down to the last minute of the game. You could argue that he was the difference in the series.
@Keith00 @okcjim Good point on rebounding I forgot how LeBron crashed the boards. I agree with you in general but most of the 'solutions' short of Ibaka just getting better seem farfetched.
@justin_mia @okcjim A minimal discrepancy on the boards is a big loss for us if we are trying to play big. Lebron and Bosh both out-rebounded our bigs. Perkins struggled to guard Bosh while killing the offense, Ibaka struggled to guard Battier but Battier's impact is rather overstated given he never took a ton of shots anyway.
All I'm saying is that there are specific issues we have combating a small lineup with a big lineup. There is a reason teams go small, but it is compounded against our bigs because they generally do not provide the inherent advantages of staying with a bigger lineup.
@Keith00 @okcjim I thought after game two we did a better job with Ibaka on Battier. It wasn't perfect but it wasn't nuts, either. The big difference on defense after that was removing Durant from LeBron and having James Harden defend him - and then the double teams one pass away.
@Keith00Against the Heat we had a bigger problem with Battier hitting open 3's than getting dominated on the boards. The rebounding disparity wasn't huge. I'm not sure PJ3 could be much worse of a rebounder than Perk is.
Royce talked about alot of teh Brooklyn fans "ohhing and ahhing" and he is right, they even did it on that Durant miss. Even the opponents fans were marveled by that explosivo.
Just rented thunderstuck... here we go...
his mom in a cheer-leading outfit is scarring
Link to the 66'ers game?
@Lambchop http://www.nba.com/dleague/games/20121205/SXFTUL/gameinfo.html
@novelisticbee0 Thank you!!
I wonder how many shots PJ jacks up today. Interested in seeing what his stat line looks like after this game.
@novelisticbee0 66 shots, in honor of it being his 1st game with the 66ers.
@Tronchaser Ha! What about Lamb? 33 again?
Heat have lost 3 in a row to the Wiz.
The Kevin Martin not being involved thing is almost exactly like how it was with James Harden.
2011-12
James Harden FGA per 36
w/Westbrook: 8.9
no/Westbrook: 16.3
2012-13
Kevin Martin FGA per 36
w/Westbrook: 8.5
no/Westbrook: 18.3
Like Harden, Martin has been putting up some elite scoring numbers when Westbrook is on the bench, around 27 points per 36 minutes on 60%+ TS. Not involving others like Harden did but the same general effect.
Westbrook himself unsurprisingly gets much more efficient and better when either Harden or Martin are on the court with him, though. So while he's not involving Martin enough, the effect is felt there at least.
@justin_mia Thanks. Ive been Rw;s harshest critic this year but have recognized his maturation since about game 3 or 4 this year in his willingness to pass first. However, Ive paid ver close attention to when he looks for K Mart ad its almost nil, especially int he 4th. WIth K MArts dead eye from deep, youd think hed want to utilize that strength. This is precisely why Harden would ball hog at the end of games because hed never see the ball otehr wise. Russ has seemed to improve over the first 3 quarters, but devolves in the 4th. It could still be considered progress but Martin needs to shoot the ball 11-14 times a game, Not liek the 4 he did last night thru 27
@justin_mia
That last point is kind of what I've been saying with the second group. If they could get another scoring option in with that 2nd group I think it would open things up. With Thabo and Thabeet in there there's not a lot of spacing. Teams can stick to Martin if they want because the guys guarding Thabo and Thabeet can help off without much worry of those guys hurting them. That second group hurt us again at the end of the 3rd last night.
@okcjim The issue with the second units has been mostly on the defensive end
@justin_miaI won't disagree with you on that last point.
@okcjim The Thunder outperformed what you'd expect from them against Miami. They scored at a higher rate than their general season average against them, and Miami was far from an average defense - although, playing so much small ball may have effected that. Miami's had defensive issues this year playing that way.
The defense against Miami could have been improved by playing small more often. Maybe keep Perkins off the court completely against their starters.
@justin_miaMaybe Maynor. It's an easier fix I think to improve the offense by replacing Thabo or Thabeet. Jackson might help a little bit over Maynor but he hasn't been anything special defensively either.
@justin_miaThe Miami defense was better against the rest of the league but the Thunder were one of the better offenses in the league. If Thabo and Thabeet are playing solely for their defensive impact how do you improve that group defensively? Take out Martin and Maynor?
@okcjim You can look at it the other way except it makes less sense. The offense performed better than you'd expect against a very good defense, so it's glib to expect or want the difference made up there. Defense on the other hand only had one game where it was decent, so it's much easier to expect or want defensive improvement. When you're really good at something it's harder to get better.
@justin_mia
You can look at that both ways too. The first 3 of our losses were all in doubt. Make a couple more shots or get a couple more stops either way and you win.
@okcjim Defense lost us a Finals, it's fairly important.
@justin_miaIf you can score with the other team the defensive problems aren't an issue. That's how we won 117-111 last night. Defense was bad all around last night.
@justin_mia What about Russ' or KD's FGA/36 with Harden/Martin on the floor? How do those look?
@ou_sas Russ is about even with and without Martin or Harden. Durant goes up a bit with Martin or Harden. Not all that much.
@justin_miaWestbrook himself unsurprisingly gets much more efficient and better when either Harden or Martin are on the court with him, though. So while he's not involving Martin enough, the effect is felt there at least."
Why does that feel like the consolation prize though? lol
@Tronchaser These are all nitpicks for the moment since the team is #1 in offense comfortably but it could be very relevant in the playoffs.
@justin_mia @Tronchaser yes, and our margin of victory would improve, our effeciency would improve, are ball movement more constant and rhythmic, and an overall balance and certainty woul arise from it. Again, weve had trouble with top 6 teams. This difficulty woudl lessen if we coudl solve this 4th quarter stagnation and 2 dimensionality
@justin_mia instead with harden we had 3 primary scoring options now we have 4