There aren’t many people in Oklahoma who everyone else often refers to by their first name alone. But Aubrey McClendon is one of them.
Tuesday’s news that McClendon is retiring as CEO of Chesapeake Energy Corp. is the kind of thing that only makes waves nationally if you’re an energy or financial news junkie. But in Oklahoma, it’s the kind of news that dominates Twitter feeds for a while, comes up at family dinner tables and is generally the talk of the town. McClendon, or just Aubrey around here, is unique among the various local luminaries. He’s celebrated for his undeniable philanthropy and role as a true visionary in a core economic sector — a man who deserves as much credit as any other individual for his role in the ongoing economic renaissance in Oklahoma City and the state at large — but he’s also a bit of an enigma. There has always been a sense that Chesapeake’s rise, and McClendon’s, had a little bit of alchemy to it, some smoke and mirrors. Even fellow wildcatters think of him and his company as risk takers. So opinions on the man vary, but everyone knows who he is, and everyone has one.
And anyone who watches Thunder basketball knows it’s also hard to overstate the depth and breadth of the links between McClendon, Chesapeake and the team. So if you’re wondering if his departure from the company he founded will affect the Thunder, the answer is yes. But only time will tell how big of an impact it has.
Aubrey’s legacy
To begin to describe how closely the Thunder and McClendon are tied, you don’t even really start with the fact he’s got the biggest ownership stake in the team than anyone other than Clay Bennett. You start with the story of the newest energy boom in Oklahoma City. (And I promise I’ll be brief — this is a basketball blog after all, of course, and many of you Oklahoma-based Thunder fans already know the story.)
The oil bust and savings and loan scandals in Oklahoma City in the 1980s form the valley after which today’s peaks have followed. The city was depressed, financially and emotionally. Not long after, McClendon and Tom Ward founded Chesapeake Energy. The company, and McClendon in particular, grew at an astronomical rate over the years thanks to an insatiable desire for land, truly innovative and game-changing drilling techniques and, as it turns out, what can politely be called creative accounting. But mostly, the success was due to the land acquisitions and fancy drilling that allowed Chesapeake to cheaply access oil and natural gas that was previously too difficult and costly to get out of the ground.
Over time, Chesapeake and other Oklahoma City-based energy companies like Devon, and the men at their helms, became the local area’s champions, cheerleaders and benefactors, all rolled into one. When other companies like Conoco-Phillips were abandoning Oklahoma for Texas and other locations, the likes of Chesapeake and Devon were doubling down on their commitments to the state. To say that McClendon and his peers have been intensely loyal to Oklahoma and Oklahoma City in particular would be an understatement.
So you’re a rich guy who loves his city and state, and they both need help, and you also would like to benefit from some of the things other rich guys in other cities do. What do you do? You start by keeping your company’s headquarters in your home state, even if there are benefits to moving. You hire every local worker who’s qualified, pay them well and shower them with other benefits and perks. You import bright minds from around the world to work for you, and their salaries help fuel a boom in the local economy. Your company’s success and role as a primary employer leads to a boom in related industries, where the dollars for the products and services they sell are imported from other places to the benefit of your home town.
Don’t have high-quality retail for you and your employees to spend all that money? Build an upscale shopping center. Upset that your city can’t seem to lure a Whole Foods, when that’s not a problem in Tulsa or Dallas? Subsidize one. Need new digs? Build an elaborate campus in an area that could use a little bit of rejuvenation, make it a living city where your employees want to spend their entire day, and make it a destination for everyone else during the holiday season. Like good food? Build some sweet restaurants with your own money. Want to help out the less fortunate in your city? Donate a bunch of money, constantly, and build a “community plaza” to house nonprofits that need some space.
You and your state’s sports fans have a taste for NBA basketball thanks to Hurricane Katrina, but you don’t have a team to call your own? Buy one. And turn it into a perennial contender. And keep ticket prices reasonable.
And that’s why he’s just Aubrey in Oklahoma. Everyone usually knows who the rich guys are in a given area. But when one of them has a relatively rare name, has a thoroughbred of a company and is as generous as he is within your local community, you don’t need his full name to talk about him. He’s just that big of a deal. In Facebook posts and tweets and blogs and lots of other places, he’s just Aubrey. That’s all you need to say. Clay Bennett may be a more recognizable name to NBA fans than Aubrey, but around here, Aubrey is more famous.
Chesapeake’s sponsorship
In much the same way that McClendon lavished Oklahoma City with the benefits of his company’s success, Chesapeake has wrapped the Thunder in its warm embrace. Obviously, the Thunder play in Chesapeake Energy Arena, for starters. But it goes deeper.
It’s impossible to watch a Thunder game on Fox Sports Oklahoma without seeing Chesapeake commercials — and the commercials from Devon, SandRidge and the other biggest team sponsors. Chesapeake’s logos were all over the arena even before they bought the naming rights. They own a massive chunk of season tickets, and are generous in making them available to employees and others. And that’s all separate from McClendon’s personal contributions to the team’s balance sheet as the No. 2 guy in the ownership group. He’s as key as anyone at the highest level of the organization in deciding how much money Sam Presti and his team will have to spend in a given season.
But there are some indications that Chesapeake’s sponsorship deal with the Thunder is a little sweeter than it otherwise might be. This CNBC report details Chesapeake’s corporate tickets, for example, showing that the company has an unusually large number of season tickets, and it could help control the market for Thunder tickets in general. And it raised at least a few eyebrows when Chesapeake was the company that swooped in to buy naming rights to the arena, which had no sponsor for an entire season. (Can’t get the naming rights deal you want for your new NBA team’s arena? Have your own company offer what you were looking for.)
It reminds me of the way some European soccer clubs get around rules that are meant to ensure they don’t spend a lot more than they make, which is how the rich guys who own them have been able to make once-moribund clubs become world beaters. Take Manchester City FC in the English Premier League — coincidentally owned by another energy company fat cat. When the team needed more money, the owner had the airline he’s associated with hand over a ridiculous amount of money in an obviously inflated sponsorship deal. Problem solved.
What’s next?
So is the Thunder on the verge of losing the team’s sugar daddies, McClendon and Chesapeake? It’s hard to say. But it would be risky to bet that things will go on unchanged.
The troubles of McClendon and Chesapeake have been well-documented. I would venture to guess that 2012 was the worst year of McClendon’s life, at least professionally. The creative accounting created a company, and a man, that were asset rich and cash poor. Essentially, Chesapeake and McClendon were going to struggle to pay their bills without radical change, and the more people found out about how Chesapeake and McClendon got into the situations they were in, the more skeletons they were able to discover in closets, some of which few knew existed until recently.
Still, it’s not like McClendon and Chesapeake are going to be homeless. McClendon’s worth may have declined by about $500 million in the last couple of years, but that’s easier to stomach when that means you still have another $500 million leftover. His severance package alone could be worth as much as $50 million, NewsOK reported. And Chesapeake has largely completed the asset sales they needed to stay afloat, and they still have some of the choicest tracts of land in North America as far as energy production is concerned.
But Oklahoma City is already feeling the pinch. Chesapeake is going to cut its charitable giving in half. Everyone knows someone who works for Chesapeake, and we’re all at least a little worried about them personally and about the company as a whole. When there’s any risk at all of a company like Chesapeake going through hard times, the entire community will at least keep an eye on it, wondering what the consequences will be.
So in that environment, it’s pretty easy to imagine that the Thunder are going to feel the effects of McClendon’s departure and Chesapeake’s transition in one way or another. When a company is struggling as publicly and significantly as Chesapeake is, it’s reasonable to assume that the consequences will extend to every corner of the company’s activities.
Few people really know how much Chesapeake contributes to the Thunder’s balance sheet. (If you are one of the few and you’re feeling talkative, please drop us a line!) Probably only McClendon knows if this means he’ll have to sell all or part of his stake in the team. It’s impossible for any of us to know what the man’s inclination is.
And some of these issues can resolve themselves independent of Chesapeake and McClendon. If he has to sell his share of the team, surely there are willing buyers with deep enough pockets to carry on his role. If Chesapeake has to release some of those corporate tickets, the season ticket waiting list can be tapped pretty easily.
Nonetheless, it’s hard to forget that the Thunder are the team that made the choice to trade a star player instead of paying him a few million more dollars and the accompanying luxury tax penalties. OKC may not exactly be pinching pennies, but it’s never going to have a Lakers-like payroll either. So what’s happening to McClendon and Chesapeake is worth keeping an eye on. That it will have at least some effect on the Thunder is a given. There will be plenty of people watching to see just how big, and just how adverse, that effect will be.





I just want to say that I have lived in Oklahoma for my entire 28 years on this earth, and I have, literally, never heard anyone refer to Aubrey McClendon as "Aubrey". That is, unless it is the immediately followed by "McClendon".
I think I may live in a parallel universe where reality isn't as how you describe it:
"He’s celebrated for his undeniable philanthropy and role as a true visionary in a core economic sector"
Maybe he was, by Chesapeake employees. However, the general public doesn't see him as much of a reason to celebrate. Also, that need to celebrate him has decreased as the years have progressed. For all that he does right, he has, and I use this term loosely, "hid" his wrong doings that anyone with any sort of social insight would know about rather quickly. Also, I have worried about the people I know at Chesapeake for years. Their practices, especially medical, are borderline illegal and their hiring has jumped the line and, in most departments, is prejudice. There is no EOE. I don't know, maybe I didn't live with people who just judged what the news said and lived with those that knew him personally, but the man that I know named Aubrey McClendon is not how you have described him.
I did , at one time enjoy the honour of having Mr. McClendon be familiar enough of me to feel free to call me by name. I know in my head that at the time he was going through his internal "who is that guy now...' catalogue, but it was never the less true that I enjoyed that he would do it. I did and do still like him and resepect him. I have seen him only at work and related situations, but he was as far as I could tell one of the very few really good guys that made it. I am sorry for him that this will be a thing he regrets and I am sorry for Chesapeake.
This might be an additional link worth reading. A series of pieces by Chris Helman of Forbes on Chesapeake in relation to operations, valuation and the chances of a takeover occurring sometime in the future.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2013/01/29/aubrey-mcclendon-out-at-chesapeake-energy/
http://dailythunder.com/2013/01/practice-report-home-again/
Movin on up
Ha, so random input, has nothing to do with basketball. But i have been on a craigslist patch the last couple of days, getting stuff free from craigslist and selling it for a profit. is this bad?:(
@ThunderPeakes can't knock the hustle
OKC needs an american apparel and an H&M amongst all those things aubrey mcclendon has brought to the metro. can't skimp out on the fashion
@sleeping-giant.tumblr My wife reminds me almost every day how much she misses New York just because of H&M lol
@thunder_mike i don't blame her. the state needs an overhaul when it comes to style. H&M is a simple first step.
Pretty good read. Honestly, I feel like the Thunder are probably going to be fine. This was eventually going to happen, for more than one reason. It isn't a sustainable model for an organization as big as the Thunder, or even the rise of OKC to be on the shoulders of the same 3 companies forever. I'm sure some other wealthy human will buy a stake of one of the most profitable sports franchises, and the Keep it Local movement will certainly buy up and occupy the soon-to-be empty Chesapeake colonies.
Also, anyone in the private sector knew that this was eventually going to happen to Chesapeake. Everything about them screams 'too good to be true'. They basically built an internalized city around their campus, shelling out millions upon millions on inflated salaries, upscale this and that, and just consistently buying every available office space in OKC trying to expand their empire.
I'm not hating at all. I appreciate what McClendon and Chesapeake have done for the city, but the investments and expected returns have never matched up in my mind.
By the way, I should also add that I feel sorry for all the people that will be losing their jobs. That really sucks for anyone.
@thunder_mike
I actually don't feel sorry for the people that will lose there jobs. I've known 5 out of state contractors that worked at the Chesapeake offices all of them said they were treated like dirt. I feel bad that Chesapeake will be a blemish on their Resumes as it screams spoiled, high maintence and entitled
Thanks for addressing the topic, Royce.
So, who takes over for Aubrey? Will the new leadership have similar ties/loyalties to the state or the city? As a person who works in an industry (though not energy related) tied to the local economy's ebbs and flows, I find this news disconcerting. I wonder how long it will be before various departments within the company begin getting moved to other locations. I wonder about the long term future for Chesapeake in OKC. This company has a large impact on our local economy. So... while I do wonder about how Aubrey's retirement will affect the Thunder... my concerns run deeper than just the impact on the team.
Now, Royce, post something so I can give you a free like for incorporating and linking to that Monty Python quotation.
I am so horrible bored right now. Who's idea was it to have a 3 day break in between games? lol
@ThunderPeakes david stern's mom
@thunderbolt @ThunderPeakes Thats so offending! She is a nice lady!!
@ThunderPeakes i knw, thats y she gave us three days off
@ThunderPeakes
At least we've got each other . . .
@ThunderChick2010 @ThunderPeakes am so jealous.. :(
@ThunderChick2010 @ThunderPeakes ok, TC :)
@thunderbolt @ThunderChick2010 @ThunderPeakes
I meant 'we' as in all of us at DT, of course.
Milwaukee could be an interesting trade partner (as we've discussed). Here is a break down of their roster as the trade deadline gets closer...
http://www.brewhoop.com/2013/1/14/3874276/milwaukee-bucks-lineup-pyramids-vol-5
@okcjim
They have a lot of peices I like; Henson, Dunleavy, LR Mbah A Moute, Sanders, Illyasova; I just don't know what it takes to get any of them and if the price is probably too high
@okcjim they have nothing I would want that is reasonable for them to give up.
@f5alconThe reason bad teams are bad is because they don't always do what it reasonable. They have some nice pieces.
@f5alconThey traded Andrew Bogut and Stephen Jackson for Monte Ellis
Here's another link which might be of interest in viewing Icahn unplugged, so to speak. This was just last week on MSNBC...when he and further billionaire hedge fund manager, Bill Ackman, got into it over a previous deal and opposites current plays on Herbalife. It's lengthy, but probably should be a must see for not just Thunder fans, but all people who live in Oklahoma.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/01/29/carl-icahn-bill-ackman-billionaire-bad-boys-cnbc/
@El Prez Not much can be done about it, unless other billionaires get involved, if I was one, I would just buy a huge stake in the thunder
So I made andreB quit livefyre from his posts about podcasts without any info... I actually listened. And it's not bad. It's a group of local guys apparently. This current version has carson cunningham from Channel 5.
@Tronchaser i clicked on it too, it seemed ok but i didn't have time to listen to the whole thing. Posting it without any info and hoping people support it is not a great strategy.
@OBoy Jones III I agree... I didn't mean the guy should quite posting... just add some info. Did I come across too harsh?
@Tronchaser No, you were fine, this isn't free advertising podcast space.
Attached is a current oiece stating Carl Icahn's current position in Chesapeake. Basically, Icahn has a history of leveraging companies and stripping assets. I can't seeing it in any way being a positive for OKC or the Thunder in OKC.
http://beta.fool.com/hoangquocanh/2013/01/16/carl-icahns-top-positions-part-ii/21499/?source=eednaslnk0000001
@El Prez He wiped out kerr-mcgee previously.
@El Prez :(
New Harden Foot Locker commercial. Of course it features Kris Hunphries. www.youtube.com/embed/I4BbAwRiy7k
If Danny Granger is close to 100 percent and makes his return to the court in the coming weeks, he's a guy that Indiana may look to move before the Feb. 21 trade deadline for the right player. But who would they look to get in return? Our own Chad Ford tackled this question during his chat on Sports Nation today, and came with with two names that could very well interest the Pacers. Here's Ford with more.
@okcjim I would trade martin and maynor for him as i indicated befoer.
@Lost Ones @okcjim
demand Augustine back so he can be reunited with KD and get back to 40% 3pt sniping, off the bench
@1 Knee 4 Points 5 Rebounds 35 Million Dollars @okcjim but his contract his huge.
@1 Knee 4 Points 5 Rebounds 35 Million Dollars @okcjim that wouldnt be bad at all.
@Lost Ones @okcjim Though if you trade martin and maynor for him it still doesn't do much to bolster the bench production....
I'm not sure how much this does for us. Granger isn't very good defensively and moving forward I doubt we could resign him for as cheap as we could Martin. The only thing good it would do is it would open a potential spot in the lineup for Lamb when he figures out defense.
@okcjim before
Good read. Better than what a lot of what NewsOK has put out so far on the Aubrey/Thunder front. Long live the Bloggers!!!!
That was a great read. I don't think many of us realize the amount of money that is funneled in from corporate sponsership throughout the league. The big market teams don't get the bulk of their money necessarily from sponsers, but from individual TV money. Chicago Bulls have WGN, which can be seen on most cable providers. NY Knicks have MSG. Lakers have Time Warner. Most other NBA teams have the regional Fox Sports contract, which pays out alot less than an individual team to television contract would.
That whole article about Aubrey Mcclendon and not one word about his niece?
@okcjim That whole article about Aubrey Mcclendon and not one picture of his niece
fixed that for you.
@f5alconHaha, thanks. That's what I meant.
Great read